Syrious Problem
I fail to understand why time and again America assumes a
moral high ground and self-appoints itself as the custodian of all the basic
human values. Violation to any such human values anywhere across the world
somehow makes it restless till it takes an action against it. More often than
not such intervention has led to disastrous consequences, sometimes more severe
than the original reason why they intervened in the first place. America also remains
in a perennial mode of conflict with the UN. While it wants rest of the world
to toe the line drawn by the UN, it considers itself to be over and above any
such rule or charter defined by the UN
.
In 2002-2003 USA under the Bush administration showed
satellite pictures of Iraq’s supposed nuclear weapon sites and the mobility
around them and used that as conclusive evidence that Saddam Hussein was in possession
of Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) or was in the process of building one. As
they prepared to attack Iraq they also sited atrocities against Iraqi populace
by the Saddam regime as another reason why they should intervene. Despite
repeated IAEA visits and no conclusive evidences, they attacked – caught Saddam
– and made attempts at building a democracy in a country that doesn’t know what
it means. Needless to say, after lives of many American soldier and Iraqi
civilian were lost, after many human bombs exploded and almost a decade later
to the attack – neither has Iraq known any peace nor has US of A found any WMD.
This left Tony Blair red in the face for having trusted all the seemingly fake
evidences that George Bush showed him. Bush has later on confessed that this
was the worst mistake of his administration.
In 2013 we are at the brink of another similar situation. Despite
the ongoing UN inspection for use of Chemical Weapons in Syria and no conclusion
as yet, Obama administration is preparing for a strike again with no sanction or approval by
UN and no conclusive evidence. World has seen
through US’s bluff during Iraq, atleast that has ensured that David Cameron doesn’t do a
Tony Blair, neither does he have his parliament’s nod. France and Russia are strongly advising against such a strike.Also even if chemical weapons were indeed used, am sure there
are ways of imposing sanctions or other ways of dealing with the situation than
the use of Force or Military strike. The cost of such a strike would be immense
for Syrians, US armed forces and needless to say the ripples of this would be
felt across the world.
Hope sanity prevails and we find a better way to resolve the
situation.
Labels: Politics
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Add your comments here
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home